Skip to main content

Table 5 ANOVA tables for the effect of anatomical model in planning for truncus cases. Response variable is case length of time

From: 3D printing for congenital heart disease: a single site’s initial three-yearexperience

Case length of time (anatomical model vs Traditional Planning): Truncus

Source

D.F.

Adj. S.S.

Adj. M.S.

F-Value

P-Value

3DP

1

11,267

11,267

1.47

0.271

Error

6

45,959

7660

 

Total

7

57,226

  

Planning

N

Mean (minutes)

St.Dev

95 C.I.

SoC

6

321.7

95.9

(234.2, 409.1)

3DP

2

235.00

1.41

(83.57, 386.43)

  1. Case length of time’s Cohen’s d effect size was very large (1.278) suggesting a practical difference between SoC and 3DP case length of time for Truncus patient cases. Similar to the DORV patients, this very large effect size strongly suggests the poor p-value may be related to the study population size, not the variance or mean difference