Skip to main content

Table 2 Rate of prediction for cup and stem size when using 3D planning

From: Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study

Reference

Subjects

n

Surgical

Indication

Planning

Software

Cemented/C.less

Total Hip System

Stem Modularity

(Yes/No)

Size Prediction (%)

Stem-Cup

(Viceconti, Lattanzi et al. 2003) [15]

29

DDH (65.6%)

Hip-Op

C.less

Y

51.7

65.5

(Sariali, Mouttet et al. 2009) [17]

223

OA

HIP-PLAN

C.less

Y

94

86

(Huppertz, Radmer et al. 2011) [28]

92

NA

3D-Hip Plan®

99% C.less

Y

NA

NA

(Sariali, Mauprivez et al. 2012) [16]

60

OA

Hip-Plan™

C.less

Y

100

96

(Hassani, Cherix et al. 2014) [18]

50

NA

HIP-PLAN

C.less

Y

100

94

(Inoue, Kabata et al. 2015) [23]

57

DDH

ZedHip

C.less

N

65

92

(Mainard, Barbier et al. 2017) [29]

31

OA

hipEOS™

C.less

N

84a

92a

(Ogawa, Takao et al. 2018) [25]

111

DDH

CT-Based Hip Navigation System

C.less

N

86

94

(Wako, Nakamura et al. 2018) [30]

46

OA (78%)

ZedHip

C.less

Y

92a

90a

Current Study

45

OA

MyHip

C.less

N

93

89

  1. DDH Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip; NA Not Available; OA Osteoarthritis
  2. a: within one size