Skip to main content

Table 2 Rate of prediction for cup and stem size when using 3D planning

From: Can 3D surgical planning and patient specific instrumentation reduce hip implant inventory? A prospective study

Reference Subjects
n
Surgical
Indication
Planning
Software
Cemented/C.less
Total Hip System
Stem Modularity
(Yes/No)
Size Prediction (%)
Stem-Cup
(Viceconti, Lattanzi et al. 2003) [15] 29 DDH (65.6%) Hip-Op C.less Y 51.7 65.5
(Sariali, Mouttet et al. 2009) [17] 223 OA HIP-PLAN C.less Y 94 86
(Huppertz, Radmer et al. 2011) [28] 92 NA 3D-Hip Plan® 99% C.less Y NA NA
(Sariali, Mauprivez et al. 2012) [16] 60 OA Hip-Plan™ C.less Y 100 96
(Hassani, Cherix et al. 2014) [18] 50 NA HIP-PLAN C.less Y 100 94
(Inoue, Kabata et al. 2015) [23] 57 DDH ZedHip C.less N 65 92
(Mainard, Barbier et al. 2017) [29] 31 OA hipEOS™ C.less N 84a 92a
(Ogawa, Takao et al. 2018) [25] 111 DDH CT-Based Hip Navigation System C.less N 86 94
(Wako, Nakamura et al. 2018) [30] 46 OA (78%) ZedHip C.less Y 92a 90a
Current Study 45 OA MyHip C.less N 93 89
  1. DDH Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip; NA Not Available; OA Osteoarthritis
  2. a: within one size