Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of subjective assessment of conventional simulator (Group A) and novel simulator (Group B) using Likert scales (1–10, 1 = strongly agree / very good, 10 = strongly disagree / very bad)

From: Evaluating a novel 3D printed model for simulating Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ)

Questions:

Group A (conventional simulator)

Group B (novel simulator)

P-value

How well could the current model simulate a LLETZ?

2.9

1.4

p < 0.001

How well could the current model simulate a Pap-smear?

3.7

1.4

p < 0.001

How well could the current model simulate a biopsy of the cervix?

3.5

1.8

p < 0.001

How well could the current model simulate a curettage of the cervical canal?

4.8

2.2

p < 0.001

How do you evaluate the consistency of the artificial cervix?

5.3

2.2

p < 0.001

I could perform a real LLETZ under supervision myself

3.0

1.9

p < 0.001

I have received sufficient technical knowledge about electrosurgery

2.9

2.2

p < 0.02

The simulation training has improved my medical expertise

1.7

1.2

p < 0.004

The application of LLETZ has improved my knowledge in gynecology

1.9

1.3

p < 0.007