Table 1 Results of patient specific phantom assessment
From: Patient-specific neurosurgical phantom: assessment of visual quality, accuracy, and scaling effects
Assessment of phantom realism | |||||
Nothing | Not Good | Good | Very Good | Perfect | |
Phantom general aspect (anatomical structures: proportions and locations) | 0% | 0% | 24% | 47% | 29% |
Haptic response | 0% | 0% | 18% | 59% | 24% |
Size of the brain internal structures | 0% | 0% | 18% | 53% | 29% |
Brain tissue appearance | 0% | 0% | 18% | 53% | 29% |
Relationship between internal anatomical structures used as reference for access | 0% | 0% | 24% | 35% | 41% |
Realism average | 0% | 0% | 20% | 49% | 31% |
Assessment of phantom educational potential (utility) | |||||
Nothing | Not Good | Good | Very Good | Perfect | |
To acquire basic skills necessary for surgery | 0% | 0% | 6% | 65% | 29% |
To acquire depth sensation (insertion / extraction) through the bony window | 0% | 6% | 6% | 59% | 29% |
To learn how to orient yourself during the surgical procedure | 0% | 0% | 6% | 59% | 35% |
To learn procedures | 0% | 0% | 6% | 65% | 29% |
To learn how to position drains and other equipment | 0% | 0% | 6% | 59% | 35% |
Utility Average | 0% | 1% | 6% | 61% | 32% |
Overall Average | 0% | 1% | 13% | 55% | 31% |