Table 6 Technology acceptance model survey responses for the utility of anatomical models for surgical planning
From: 3D printing for congenital heart disease: a single site’s initial three-yearexperience
Technology Acceptance Model Survey (19 responses) | ||
|---|---|---|
Question | % | Answer |
1. Was a 3D printed model used for the preparation of or during surgery/intervention? (19 applicable cases) | 21.1% | Yes |
78.9% | No | |
2. In your opinion, did use of the 3D printed model enhance your ability to execute a surgical repair? (4 applicable cases) | 100% | Yes |
0.00% | No | |
3. If no 3D model was used but CT/MR was used, did you note any additional morphological defects or unexpected variations unseen in the planning process? (14 applicable cases) | 21.4% | Yes |
78.6% | No | |
4. Please provide any additional information describing the impact of the 3D printed model during the planning or execution of this patient’s surgery? | (free text response) See section Discussion | |