Table 4 Comparison of 3D-Print, VR-Glasses and 3D-Display concerning disciplines
Variable | Cardiology (n = 5) | OMFS (n = 5) | Ortho (n = 5) | Radiology (n = 5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Understanding of the pathology | ||||
 3D-Print | 5.8 (2.5) | 8.2 (1.9) | 8.8 (1.5) | 7.2 (2.1) |
 VR-Glasses | 7.2 (1.7) | 9.0 (1.5) | 7.8 (3.0) | 8.2 (0.4) |
 3D-Display | 7.0 (2.2) | 6.6 (1.4) | 9.2 (1.2) | 7.6 (1.4) |
Accuracy of details | ||||
 3D-Print | 4.8 (1.7) | 7.4 (0.8) | 8.0 (2.1) | 6.2 (2.6) |
 VR-Glasses | 7.6 (1.5) | 8.0 (1.1) | 8.4 (1.5) | 7.6 (1.9) |
 3D-Display | 7.4 (1.7) | 8.6 (1.0) | 9.4 (1.2) | 8.6 (1.2) |
Quality of the anatomical representation | ||||
 3D-Print | 6.4 (2.4) | 8.4 (1.0) | 8.4 (1.6) | 7.0 (1.8) |
 VR-Glasses | 7.6 (0.8) | 8.6 (1.0) | 9.0 (1.5) | 8.2 (2.1) |
 3D-Display | 7.8 (1.3) | 8.2 (0.4) | 8.8 (1.5) | 8.2 (1.2) |
Technical operability | ||||
 VR-Glasses | 6.0 (1.5) | 7.6 (1.4) | 9.0 (1.2) | 8.6 (1.2) |
 3D-Display | 7.8 (2.0) | 7.8 (1.5) | 9.8 (0.4) | 9.4 (0.5) |