Skip to main content

Table 6 Possible change in treatment, a. disciplines, b. professional work experience (in years)

From: Clinical acceptance of advanced visualization methods: a comparison study of 3D-print, virtual reality glasses, and 3D-display

  

Disciplines

Years of experience

Average (n = 18)

a.

Cardiology

(n = 3)

OMFS

(n = 5)

Ortho

(n = 5)

Radiology

(n = 5)

b.

≤ 5

(n = 5)

6–10

(n = 7)

> 10

(n = 6)

3D-Print

6 (33)

 

0

2 (40)

2 (40)

2 (40)

 

2 (40)

4 (57)

0

VR-Glasses

8 (44)

 

2 (67)

1 (20)

2 (40)

3 (60)

 

3 (60)

5 (71)

0

3D-Display

6 (33)

 

1 (33)

1 (20)

2 (40)

2 (40)

 

2 (40)

4 (57)

0

  1. Data: Values are given as absolute numbers (with percentages in brackets) for binary and categorical variables. OMFS = Oral and maxillofacial surgery, Ortho = Orthopedic surgery
Back to article page

3D Printing in Medicine

ISSN: 2365-6271

Contact us