Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | 3D Printing in Medicine

Fig. 5

From: A robust, autonomous, volumetric quality assurance method for 3D printed porous scaffolds

Fig. 5

Quantification of 3D print quality for all voxels in 6 different scaffolds. Scaffolds with more complex exterior geometry (e.g. orbital arch) exhibited worse print quality, or larger voxel error, than simpler geometries (e.g. cylinder). Typically, scaffolds with heterogeneous porosities exhibited better print quality than their homogeneous counterparts except for the orbital arch. Overall, 3D print quality was captured for the entire scaffolds on a sub-voxel scale while yielding the general pattern of manufacturing error

Back to article page