Skip to main content

Table 2 Survey results from evaluations of material performance in nasal osteotomy rating each category out of five (1: very poor, 2: poor, 3: neutral, 4: good, 5: very good) reported as averages of the ratings of the three facial plastic surgeons

From: Design, printing optimization, and material testing of a 3D-printed nasal osteotomy task trainer

 

Endonasal

Percutaneous

Tactile Feedback

 FibreTuff

2.3

2.7

 Alga

3.3

3.3

 Durable V2 resin

4.3

2.7

 PLA

3.0

3.0

 SimuBone

4.7

4.0

Audio Feedback

 FibreTuff

2.3

2.3

 Alga

3.7

3.7

 Durable V2 resin

3.3

2.7

 PLA

2.7

3.0

 SimuBone

4.3

4.7

Material Limitation

 FibreTuff

2.0

1.7

 Alga

2.7

3.3

 Durable V2 resin

3.0

1.7

 PLA

2.3

2.7

 SimuBone

4.3

4.0