Skip to main content

Table 2 Exclusion criteria for full text screening with one example for each

From: Quality assurance of 3D-printed patient specific anatomical models: a systematic review

Exclusion

Example

Criteria

influences on the printing process from the engineers’ perspective

[32]

influences of slicing tools on printing accuracy from the engineers’ perspective

[48]

accuracy of implants

[49]

assessment of special post processing techniques like vapor smoothing

[50]

assessment of surface properties

[51]

assessment of STL-export from CAD software

[52]

evaluation of ageing process of printed models

[53]

evaluation of thermoformed appliances

[54]

using 3D-printed models for assessment of image acquisition

[55]

phantoms for MRI

[56]

evaluation of an experimental full-automatic segmentation algorithm

[57]

evaluation of 3D-printed models as diagnostic tool in comparison to the standard

[58]

accuracy assessment of 3D-printed surgical guides

[59]

realistic surgery models for procedure assessment

[60]

evaluation of 3D-printed models as a diagnostic tool in comparison to the standard

[58]

only visual evaluation

[61]

only review

[62]

only clinical study

[63]

only case report

[64]

no validation

[65]