Skip to main content

Development and assessment of case-specific physical and augmented reality simulators for intracranial aneurysm clipping

Abstract

Background

Microsurgical clipping is a delicate neurosurgical procedure used to treat complex Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (UIAs) whose outcome is dependent on surgeon’s experience. Simulations are emerging as excellent complements to standard training, but their adoption is limited by the realism they provide. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a microsurgical clipping simulator platform.

Methods

Physical and holographic simulators of UIA clipping have been developed. The physical phantom consisted of a 3D printed hard skull and five (n = 5) rapidly interchangeable, perfused and fluorescence compatible 3D printed aneurysm silicone phantoms. The holographic clipping simulation included a real-time finite-element-model of the aneurysm sac, allowing interaction with a virtual clip and its occlusion. Validity, usability, usefulness and applications of the simulators have been assessed through clinical scores for aneurysm occlusion and a questionnaire study involving 14 neurosurgical residents (R) and specialists (S) for both the physical (p) and holographic (h) simulators by scores going from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent).

Results

The physical simulator allowed to replicate successfully and accurately the patient-specific anatomy. UIA phantoms were manufactured with an average dimensional deviation from design of 0.096 mm and a dome thickness of 0.41 ± 0.11 mm. The holographic simulation executed at 25–50 fps allowing to gain unique insights on the anatomy and testing of the application of several clips without manufacturing costs. Aneurysm closure in the physical model evaluated by fluorescence simulation and post-operative CT revealed Raymond 1 (full) occlusion respectively in 68.89% and 73.33% of the cases. For both the simulators content validity, construct validity, usability and usefulness have been observed, with the highest scores observed in clip selection usefulness Rp=4.78, Sp=5.00 and Rh=4.00, Sh=5.00 for the printed and holographic simulators.

Conclusions

Both the physical and the holographic simulators were validated and resulted usable and useful in selecting valid clips and discarding unsuitable ones. Thus, they represent ideal platforms for realistic patient-specific simulation-based training of neurosurgical residents and hold the potential for further applications in preoperative planning.

Background

Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (UIA) represent one of the most common neurovascular pathologies with a prevalence of 3% worldwide [1]. These rupture-prone lesions consist of focal dilations of cerebral arteries and account for 85% of non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhages, associated with poor outcomes in 35% of the cases [2]. Their management can be conservative (best medical treatment), or interventional through microsurgical Aneurysm Clipping (AC) or by application of Endovascular Techniques (EVT) [3]. Technical advancements led to an increasingly competitive situation between neurosurgeons and interventionalists, and to a shift towards an increasing number of EVT cases [4]. Simultaneously, as the number of AC cases is diminishing, a trend has been observed toward more complex UIAs – not amenable to established endovascular modalities – being referred to cerebrovascular neurosurgeons [5]. As surgical experience and caseload correlate with clinical and radio-anatomical outcomes, this decreasing number of microsurgically treated UIAs poses a challenge for the training of future neurosurgeons. Consequently, an increasing demand for cost-effective training methods able to reproduce the complexities related with AC and EVT, preferably in a single embedded solution, has been reported [6].

Emerging technologies like Additive Manufacturing (AM), Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) found a variety of applications in medicine, especially in cerebrovascular simulation [6,7,8]. Tools for training, preoperative planning, intraoperative support and postoperative evaluation have been developed [9, 10]. Bench simulators have been increasingly employed, providing reproducible and comparable training sessions, even though most of these devices or techniques were limited in terms of visual and physical realism, case-specificity, and haptic realism [11]. Different studies aimed at the realization of highly accurate rigid 3D models; [12,13,14,15,16,17] others employed soft materials to produce hollow and case-specific aneurysm models for EVT or clipping simulation; [18,19,20,21,22,23,24] numerous approaches focused on the development of whole case-specific head simulators, but with tedious and expensive production processes [14, 25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Overall, these studies share a limited mechanical behaviour or, unfortunately, a lack of implementation in clinical routine. Digital simulations of AC integrating Finite Element Modelling (FEM) have been developed to have instruments controlled through haptic devices and VR or 2D/3D monitors visualization [33,34,35]. AR has been used in neurovascular surgery, predominantly as a passive method to overlay information on the real world, thus having the potential of serving both as a technology for training and intraoperative support [36,37,38,39]. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, simulators integrating affordable 3D printed simulators as well as holographic AR and real-time FEM simulation are missing. This study complements the research conducted and reported by Dodier et al. [40], with the aim of reporting the simulators development, and to validate them in terms of their usefulness and possible applications.

Methods

Cases selection, segmentation and models preparation

This research study was approved by the institutional ethical commission of Medical University of Vienna (Nr. 1593/2021). Five UIAs cases previously treated with AC have been selected to reflect the variability of different arterial locations (Anterior Communicating Artery (AComA), Internal Carotid Artery (ICA) and Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA)), different approaching side (left and right) and different craniotomies (pterional and extended pterional/fronto-temporal). Preoperative images of the selected cases (Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA), Computer Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI)) have been segmented in Materialise Mimics 23.0 (Materialise, Belgium) and 3D Slicer to extract the volumes of brains, skulls and vessels [41]. Subsequently, the digital model of a generic skull (20 × 27 × 28 cm) and a generic brain have been acquired and registered, and the two large overlapping craniotomies have been incised on both left and right sides of the skull in Meshmixer 3.5 (Autodesk, CA, USA) [42]. A replica of a general clip applicator has been designed in the CAD software Fusion 360 (Autodesk, California, USA), and 11 different commercial clips were scanned in a MicroCT with an isotropic slice thickness of 30 μm (µCT 50, Scanco Medical, Switzerland) and segmented to obtain their digital models. The segmented models of vessels and skulls of the selected cases have been imported in Materialise 3-Matic 15.0 (Materialise, Belgium) and rigidly registered on the generic skull and brain. In each case-specific vascular model, the aneurysms were isolated from the adjacent vasculature. Due to the limitations of the available imaging techniques, it was not possible to accurately determine the precise wall thickness distribution of the aneurysm sacs. Consequently, a uniform wall thickness was assumed and set to 0.4 mm in Meshmixer 3.5 by using the offset computation tool. The chosen value of 0.4 mm was determined to optimally balance between realistic representation of thickness and manufacturability constraints.

Physical simulator

Design and parts printing

Designing the physical simulator started from the case-specific aneurysms, for which tailored housings have been developed in order to support them and their parent arteries, allow their perfusion and geometrically lock on the generic skull (Fig. 1A, B). The generic skull, with exclusion of the occipital bone, and the housings have been manufactured with the 3D printer Formlabs 2 (Formlabs, MA, USA) using the resin White V2 and imposing an internal lattice structure in order to reduce model weight and costs. Silicone 3D printing has been employed for the production of the case-specific aneurysms. This manufacturing method has been selected because it allows to print hollow samples with a wall thickness value down to 0.2 mm, considered realistic with respect to real aneurysm sac measurements [43, 44]. Additionally, the compatible material TrueSil 20 A (Young Modulus > 0.25 MPa; Hardness Shore A = 20; Tensile strength = 4.3 MPa; Elongation = 815%; Tear strength = 5.8 N/mm; SpectroPlast, Switzerland) [45] has been selected for its mechanical properties that best mimic aneurysm sac biomechanics (Young Modulus ≈ 1 MPa; Hardness Shore A < 25; Tensile strength ≈ 2 MPa; Elongation ≈ 600%) [43]. Its transparency makes it a good candidate to use liquids of different colour and mimic ICG-VA. The printed parts have then been MicroCT scanned (isotropic spatial resolution = 207 μm), and the obtained models have been compared with the original designs in MeshLab with the tool Align. Secondly, the thickness of the aneurysm sac was assessed in Materialise 3-Matic with the Thickness analysis tool. Finally, the aneurysms have been introduced in the housings and connected to extension lines allowing their perfusion (Fig. 1C).

Perfusion system

A fixed perfusion system was developed by connecting a blood-coloured mimicking fluid (water and red food dye) to a voltage controlled low-power pump (Qmax=1.8 l/min when driven at 24 V) powered at an average of 3 V. The pump was then connected to a flow switch allowing rapid connection to the extension lines of each housing (Fig. 1D) and the injection of a fluorophore to simulate the diagnostic procedure of Indocyanine Green Video-Angiography (ICG-VA; VERDYE 5 mg/ml, Diagnostic Green GmbH, Germany). As the simulator was meant to simulate constructs that allow residents who never clipped an aneurysm before to gain basic experience in basic aneurysm manipulation, microscope utilization and tools familiarization, additional anatomical structures like brain parenchyma or nerves were not replicated.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Development and setup of the physical simulator.  A Design of the generic skull with case-specific housing and case-specific aneurysm model. B Digital rendering of the interlocking system housing-skull , with the printed aneurysm in position in the housing. C Physical realization of the housing with the printed aneurysm mounted in place and connected to extension lines. D Full laboratory setup of physical simulator comprising surgical microscope , surgical tools (clips , clip applicators , forceps , saline solution , fluorophore for ICG-VA , syringes) , physical simulator connected to voltage-controlled perfusion system

Holographic simulators

Two holographic simulations implementing digital models for the AR head mounted display HoloLens1 (Microsoft, DC, USA) have been developed: a simple one without collisions between parts, and a more complex one with collisions computation. The first one involves the rendering of the aneurysms from the first four cases in the generic brain and skull, accompanied by a series of digital clip models. This facilitates a geometric comparison between the dimensions of the clips and the aneurysms, enabling a swift evaluation of various clipping strategies. However, this method does not account for model interactions or deformations. The second simulation employs computational modelling to simulate the deformation of the fifth aneurysm case in response to the application of a digitally-rendered standard bent clip. This clip is manipulated by the user through a specially designed physical tool, allowing for interactive engagement with the simulation. The physics of the aneurysm and the interaction with the clip are computed in the real-time, FEM multi-physics software SOFA Framework [46]. The aneurysm has been modelled as an elastic, isotropic biquadratic mass-spring system (E = 1 MPa, v = 0.49, vertices = 301, triangles = 545). Implicit Euler and conjugate gradient resolution methods were employed for solving the FEM. The system was dampened with a stiffness according to a Rayleigh damping model to simulate the presence of blood and improve solution stability. Two sets of springs were added at the geometric boundaries of the aneurysm model to simulate outpointing pressure and the presence of surrounding anatomy. The preselected bent-type clip has been simulated as a rotational spring system. The collision between aneurysm and clip was modelled with a penalty method tuned to have a stable resolution of the FEM during the simulation. An adaptive time step was adopted in order to achieve real-time deformations. The simulation running on a high-end PC communicated with an application running on the AR device utilizing an internet protocol, allowing the real-time visualization of the simulated aneurysm and clip as holograms. The holographic application was developed using the Unity3D software v2021.3.4f1 (Unity Technologies, CA, USA) where the visual 3D models of the segmentations and the tools have been imported. The user manipulated the simulated, and thus holographic, clip by means of a physical tool tracked by HoloLens1 thanks to the integrated image-tracking engine Vuforia (Fig. 2A-C). A controllable on/off constraint between the clip and the applicator was implemented.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Setup of the holographic simulations.  A External visualization of the Hololens1 and physical tracker for the manipulation of the digital tools. B User visualization of the tracker with digital surgical tools overlaid. C Participant wearing Hololens1 and interacting with the FEM simulation through keyboard controls and tracker manipulation

Validation of the simulators

Five specialized cerebrovascular surgeons with more than 5 years of clipping experience (n = 5) and nine neurosurgical residents without clipping experience (n = 9) signed consent forms and performed aneurysm clipping simulations on the physical simulator in a fully equipped neurosurgical laboratory with a surgical microscope (OPMI Pentero, Carl Zeiss Surgical GmbH) and 64 different clip types at their disposition (Fig. 1D). Each participant operated on all five manufactured cases twice, once in the morning and once in the afternoon. The sessions were supported by a technical expert who exchanged the cases and monitored the perfusion system. Every clipping simulation underwent the following: visual inspection, clip implantation attempts, ICG-VA and CT scans (standard or photon-counting). Outcomes from the ICG-VA were noted in terms of Raymond occlusion score (1: complete occlusion; 2: remnant neck; 3: incomplete occlusion). The complete collapsibility was assessed through CT scans. Subsequently, two of the five specialized surgeons (n = 2) and an experience stratified, randomized selection of three (n = 3) out of the nine initially included ones were exposed to the holographic simulations. Assessment of the simulators was performed through questionnaire evaluation of their content validity, face validity, construct validity, usability, usefulness and further applications (Table 1) [26, 47].

Table 1 Questionnaire for the assessment of the simulators. For each question the possible answers and corresponding numerical values are reported

Statistical analysis

Questionnaires included Likert-like questions for the assessment of categorical variables and were administered and analysed in IBM SPSS Version 28.0 (IBM Corp., NY, USA), used also for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize the demographics of the study participants and the evaluated variables as frequencies and percentages. To evaluate internal consistency of the items in the questionnaire, Cronbach’s Alpha (α) was computed. Values of α > 0.7 were assumed as sufficient to ensure the items were appropriately correlated and measured the intended construct. In reporting the results, responses provided by the residents and the specialists are denoted by the symbols ‘R’ and ‘S’ respectively. To differentiate between physical and holographic simulators, the subscripts ‘p’ and ‘h’ are used.

Results

Demographics

Our study included a total of fourteen (n = 14) participants, 9 residents and 5 specialists. Due to a gender female-to-male ratio was 1:13, gender is not reported as it can be a potential identification of participants. Neurosurgical residents were evenly distributed in terms of training level, measured in Post-Graduate Year (PGY): 33.3% in 1–2 PGY, 33.3% in 3–4 PGY, 33.4% in 5–6 PGY. Neurosurgical specialists were all considered as highly experienced, with classification criteria having clipped at least 50 UIAs. The participants were recruited from Austria (85.72%), Denmark (7.14%) and Bulgaria (7.14%).

Physical simulator

The physical models manufactured resembled accurately the anatomical dimensions of the digital models. In particular, the assembled skull resulted in a smooth surface finishing and could be clamped firmly on a typical surgical Mayfield clamp, making the setup adjustable, ergonomic and compatible with surgical microscope and microsurgical tools (Fig. 1D). The precise geometrical dimensions eased the locking with all the housings, whose extension lines have been passed through the missing occipital bone, leading to effortless connection to the hydraulic system (Fig. 1B-D). The images of the case-specific aneurysms (Fig. 3A) have been successfully segmented and the obtained models have been prepared for silicone 3D printing (Fig. 3B). When mounted in the respective housings (Fig. 3C) and connected to the perfusion system, water tightness was confirmed, and thus their possible use under surgical microscope (Fig. 3D). The realistic wall thickness allowed to visualize the colours of the intraluminal perfused fluids (Fig. 3D, E). In this case, both the red blood-mimicking liquid and the green ICG were visible in the visible spectrum, with the latter being visible also in the infrared spectrum and allowing to realistically replicate aneurysm reconstruction assessment (Additional file 1 and 2). The aneurysms were flushed with clear water before and after the execution of each ICG-VA, and no qualitatively appreciable fluorophore residues were observed (Fig. 3D, E). The results of dimensional accuracy through MicroCT scans are reported in Table 2. The average deviation from the original design was of 0.096 mm, ranging from 0.041 mm to 0.209 mm, while the average wall thickness was of 0.41 mm, ranging from an average of 0.39 mm to 0.44 mm (Fig. 4). A concentrated higher wall thickness can be observed in the five cases in the direction of printing, vertical with respect to the printing building plate. The results of ICG-VA as shown in Fig. 5A indicate that complete occlusion corresponding to Raymond 1 was the most frequent (68.89% of the cases), followed by Raymond 2 (17.78%) and Raymond 3 (13.33%). Despite their very thin wall, the material showed a high resistance to cyclic stresses and good tendency to collapse during clip application of a single implant: several clipping attempts have been performed on each aneurysm, twice per day over two days per participant. The cumulative number of clippings performed on the models during the study was therefore more than 180, with no distinguishable mechanical difference between the aneurysm models printed and used in the study with respect to the ones not used at all. During the single training sessions, switching between housings was a short process taking less than 1 min in all cases. After the use sessions, postoperative CT scans confirmed models opacity, with sufficient contrast to confirm complete aneurysm sac occlusion in average 73.33% of the cases and, when present, parent arteries stenosis (Figs. 3F and 5B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Models of the selected aneurysm cases.  A Imaging of the selected aneurysm cases. B 3D models for 3D printing. C Housings and aneurysms printed and assembled. D Microscope visualization of the cases perfused with blood-mimicking fluid during one of the utilization sessions. E Microscope infrared visualization of the cases clipped and perfused with fluorophore to perform ICG-VA. F CT scans of the post-simulation clipped aneurysm models in their housings

Table 2 Dimensional accuracy of the printed aneurysm cases with average deviation and sac thickness
Fig. 4
figure 4

Wall thickness distributions of the sacs of the printed aneurysms.  The measurements of wall thicknesses are as distribution maps on aneurysm sac case 1 (AB), case 2 (C, D), case 3 (E, F), case 4 (G, H) and case 5 (I, J)

Fig. 5
figure 5

ICG-VA results.  Results of ICG-VA are presented in terms of Raymond occlusion score (A) and CT outcome of the assessment of total aneurysm occlusion (B)

Holographic simulator

In the holographic simulations, anatomical models can be visualized, rotated, and scaled using simple hand gestures, enabling a view akin to that in actual surgery (Fig. 6A). The applicator manipulation was independent from hologram scaling and intuitive to use in both simulations with and without models interaction. The simple simulation without models interaction allowed to study the relations between anatomical structures (Fig. 6B), to rapidly preselect suitable clip types and discard unsuitable clip dimensions without simulating clip opening (Fig. 6C). Complementary, in the more complex simulation the clip could be opened with keyboard controls, applied and released, resulting in a complete collapse of the aneurysm dome (Fig. 6D-F). A computation rate of the FEM simulation of 85–245 fps allowed to achieve a smooth holographic experience with visual update of 25–50 fps without interruptions. Before and after clipping, the deactivation of the holographic, peri-aneurysmal cortical anatomy allowed unhindered inspection from any angle.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Visualization of the holographic simulator from user perspective.  A Reorientation of the anatomical models. B Visualization of the surgical access (case 1). C Comparison of clip and aneurysm dimensions without collision computation. D-F Holographic simulation of aneurysm clipping with clip opening , aneurysm closing and clip release

Validation

The assessment questionnaires of the physical and the holographic simulations have been completed respectively by fourteen and five participants, as reported in Table 3. The results confirmed the general validities of the simulators. Initially, similar content validity has been confirmed for both physical and holographic simulators, being them indicated as suitable tools for basic training by 77.78% up to 100% of the participants. Face validity of the physical simulator in terms of anatomical dimensions has been evaluated poorly (Rp=2.89, Sp=2.80), while the visual realism of both the simulators was rated as good to excellent by most of the participants (Rp=4.22, Sp=4.60, Rh=4.67, Sh=4.50). Despite the low values of answers correlation from residents, equal to αRp = 0.55, the answers from the specialists correlated well with αSp = 0.75 and allowed to confirm face validity of the physical simulator. Due to the availability of a single set of responses, consensus alpha could not be computed for face validity of the holographic simulator. Participants evaluated positively construct validity of the physical simulator in terms of physical (Rp=4.22, Sp=4.40), haptic (Rp=3.67, Sp=4.40) and time realism (Rp=3.00, Sp=4.00). The construct validity was further supported by a high level of agreement, with αRp = 0.94 and αSp = 0.87. Conversely, evaluations of the construct validity of the holographic simulator revealed lower scores for physical realism (Rh=3.67, Sh=3.50), haptic realism (Rh=3.00, Sh=2.50) and operational time (Rh=3.00, Sh=3.00). Agreement on construct validity was mixed, as αRh could not be calculated due to the availability of a single set of responses, while it was calculated αSh = 0.94. Regarding usability, both simulators were rated highly for their interfaces (Rp=4.56, Sp=4.80, Rh=3.67, Sh=4.00) and overall usability (Rp=4.56, Sp=4.60, Rh=3.33, Sh=4.00). Strong consensus was confirmed with αRp = 1, αSp = 0.75 and αRh = 0.94. The alpha value αSh could not be calculated, similar to the previous scenario. Several items were dedicated to usefulness assessment, that has been highly rated for both the simulators. In particular, the highest scores have been observed in clip selection usefulness, for which values of Rp=4.78 and Sp=5.00 have been obtained for suitable clip selection, values of Rp=4.56, Sp=4.80 for permanent clip selection and values of Rp=4.44, Sp=4.60 for non-suitable clip selection. Similar results have been observed for the holographic simulator, presenting values of Rh=4.00, Sh=5.00 for suitable clip selection, Rh=4.33, Sh=4.50 for permanent clip selection and Rh=4.33, Sh=4.50 for non-suitable clip selection. Values of αRp = 0.94, αSp = 0.9, αRh = 0.95 and αSh = 0.83 confirmed agreement regarding confirming the usefulness of both the simulators. The possible further applications of the simulators were indicated mainly as preoperative planning with Rp=88.89%, Sp=80% for the physical, and Rh=66.67%, Sh=50% for the holographic simulator. Advanced training was reported mainly for the physical simulator with Rp=77.78%, Sp=80%, and intraoperative support was reported only by few residents with Rp=11.1%.

Results of the study including 14 participants confirmed the comprehensive validity of the simulators. The physical simulator accurately replicated the sub-millimetric patient-specific anatomy, along with the holographic simulators. Both types demonstrated mechanical and dimensional accuracy and proved their validity in terms of face, content, and construct, as well as usability and usefulness. Notably, they resulted useful in selecting suitable and non-suitable clips, with potential applications in preoperative planning.

Table 3 Assessment questionnaire results

Discussion

Surgical training is currently in need for solutions that can enhance patient safety, improve effectiveness, and increase accessibility, especially in front of limited microsurgical exposure and the increasing complexity of the microsurgically treated UIAs, consequence of the rise in the portion of endovascular treated UIAs [48]. To be integrated into surgical training curricula, simulators need to be effective and validated. Training technologies should satisfy those requirements and feature case-specific, highly realistic anatomy in high volumes in order to represent valuable alternatives to animal or cadaver training. This way, simulators can not only expose the trainees to best practices, but also provide safe environments to train adverse events management, thus accelerating residents’ learning curve, increase confidence and improve patient safety [6]. The development of simulations encourages the adoption of new technologies, yet often introduces challenges such as high costs, complex familiarization processes, and the need for technical support, which can diminish their cost-effectiveness. Therefore, low costs and plug-and-play capabilities should be prioritized in the design of training simulations. We identified AM and AR as complementary technologies providing the first the flexibility of rapidly manufacturing complex anatomies, and the second the visual realism of digital models. We utilized a high-resolution silicone 3D printing technology for the realization of the physical simulation, enabling the production of case-specific intracranial vessel replicas at low manufacturing costs. The results of dimensional analysis reveal an average dimensional deviation in the order of the wall thickness of the models that, in light of the good dimensional accuracy of wall thickness, is interpretable as a consequence of the light deformation of the model when introduced in the MicroCT scanner. Despite the phantoms could realistically collapse thanks to the reduced wall thickness, they did not show any residual deformation after repeated use. The overall concordance between the outcomes of ICG-VA and CT indicates that ICG-VA simulations could serve as an effective evaluation tool, even when CT is not available. The observed discrepancies between the two sets of results may be attributed to the fact that aneurysms assessed with a Raymond score of 1 or 2 can appear as completely occluded in CT scans. General validity of the physical simulator was confirmed. Despite the absence of other anatomical structures apart from the UIA, the level of complexity of the physical simulator was sufficient to ensure content, face and construct validity, but not so high to hinder user experience in terms of usability and intuitiveness. In particular, the properties of physical realism and haptic realism were strongly confirmed, as well as usability. This derived probably by the compatibility of the simulator with a laboratory completely resembling an operational room in terms of positioning possibilities, tools, microscope and procedure steps. In this scenario, intuitiveness was observed by a natural behaviour of the specialists approaching the simulator, preparing the set before being explained the step by step use of the simulator. Remarkably, the simulator was indicated as highly useful for the specific procedure of UIA clipping in selecting possible, permanent and non-suitable clips. This could explain the reason why the most suitable further application of the physical simulator is preoperative planning, in which the main challenges of clip selection and patient positioning can be well tackled with this simulator. Conversely, the holographic simulators bring the complementary benefits of digital solutions. In details, the first and simpler holographic simulator allows to rapidly compare clip dimensions with aneurysm sac, based on the assumption that sac dimensions remain almost unchanged upon collapse. Differently, the FEM simulation relies on the opposite assumption, making the computation of deformations needed to accurately simulate the aneurysm sac. The advanced visualization functionalities available in the holographic simulation allow to achieve a higher realism without the complexities of the physical case, with the unique possibility of enlarging, activating or hiding the digital models. The interactive clipping simulation represents the first integration of FEM with AR head-mounted devices. Content validity was confirmed also for the holographic simulator, for which face validity scored extremely high thanks to the additional anatomies and realistic textures used. The poor scores of construct validity can be motivated with the absence of a haptic feedback, that does not allow to physically perceive the physical realism, leading to mainly “not agree nor disagree” answers. The good scores of usability reflected the short learning curve of the users, that rapidly familiarized with the AR environment and the holographic simulations. The possibility of deepening the visualization and deactivating the models can explain the high scores of usefulness in understanding vascular anatomy. This allows to proficiently study aneurysm morphology and to preselect plausible clips without manufacturing costs and discards. This can also suggest higher utility of the simpler holographic simulation to understand the anatomy and study the general clipping approach, and higher utility of the interactable simulation for clip selection.

This work presents some potential limitations. During the development of the physical simulator we encountered the same manufacturing challenges described in literature, starting with aneurysm sac wall thickness: it could not be derived by available images, so a constant wall thickness equal to 0.4 mm was assumed, representing the first deviation from morphological reality. Additionally, the models were printed without correction of the intraluminal pressure of when the images were acquired, leading to an over-pressurized model. Nevertheless, the effect of additional pressure on the models when perfused was limited to a minimal inflation. Constant perfusion did represent another deviation from reality. The adoption of pre-stress correction, together with a pulsatile fluid pump, can overcome these limitations. The absence of brain parenchyma in the physical simulator could explain the lower score of anatomical dimensions of the physical simulator. Moreover, due to the absence of arachnoid to dissect to access the aneurysm and its surrounding, simulation time was sensibly shorter and specialists’ scores about approach study usefulness were average. Despite the absence of simulated brain, the physical simulation replicates the complexities of UIA clipping for residents training and allowed to confirm construct validity. The perceived fragility of the vessel, despite its stress resistance demonstrated throughout the entire study, represented the main challenge for the trainees, purposed to learn principles like respect for tissue, instrument handling, knowledge of instruments and specific procedure [49]. The implementation of mechanically and visually realistic case-specific brain phantom could overcome these limitations and allow the simulator to be used also for advanced training, including in future steps also arachnoid dissection and dura opening. Intraoperative support was not reported as possible application probably because of sterilization processes limiting its use in the operational field. The low realism of simulation time represented a limitation also for the holographic simulations, that together with the absence of haptic feedback did not allow to confirm construct validity. Even though AR simulations could benefit by the addition of haptic feedback manipulators, their use tailored for anatomy understanding and (possibly) preoperative planning do not make it a requirement. The use of the HoloLens 1 system still represented the main limitation, affecting usability and not allowing the use of both hands for the manipulation of tools in the holographic simulations. This is not expected to remain an issue once the latest generation (HoloLens 2) is implemented instead [50]. Preoperative planning was indicated as the most suitable further application of the simulators after basic training. If, on the one hand, the brain parenchyma brings a higher visual realism, improve face validity and limit the available space for clips, on the other hand it was proven through the holographic simulators that it is not strictly necessary to use the simulators in preoperative planning and do clips selection. The integration of 3D printing and AR based simulators is envisioned by the authors. Such simulations can bring the potential of providing a comprehensive platform to train microsurgical skills. Furthermore, with the increase of available simulators, the need for a unique and reproducible evaluation measurement scale is emerging, which shall be developed and tested in a controlled environment.

Conclusions

The need for case-specific, microsurgical training tools is growing and unmet. In this work, low-cost physical and digital simulators with state-of-the-art realism have been developed and validated. Furthermore, their usefulness and future applications have been evaluated.

Availability of data and materials

The experimental data and the simulation results supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

UIA:

Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm

AC:

Aneurysm Clipping

EVT:

Endovascular Techniques

AM:

Additive Manufacturing

AR:

Augmented Reality

VR:

Virtual Reality

FEM:

Finite Element Modelling

AComA:

Anterior Communicating Artery

ICA:

Internal Carotid Artery

MCA:

Middle Cerebral Artery

DSA:

Digital Subtraction Angiography

CT:

Computer Tomography

MRI:

Magnetic Resonance Images

ICG-VA:

Indocyanine Green-video angiography

PGY:

Post-Graduate Year

References

  1. Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, Rinkel GJ. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(7):626–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Etminan N, Rinkel GJ. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: development, rupture and preventive management. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(12):699–713. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2016.150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson BG, Brown RD, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a Guideline for Healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46(8):2368–400. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Darsaut TE, Estrade L, Jamali S, Bojanowski MW, Chagnon M, Raymond J. Uncertainty and agreement in the management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: clinical article. JNS. 2014;120(3):618–23. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.11.JNS131366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dodier P, Wang WT, Hosmann A, et al. Combined standard bypass and parent artery occlusion for management of giant and complex internal carotid artery aneurysms. J NeuroIntervent Surg. 2022;14:593. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017673. Published online August 5, 2021:neurintsurg-2021-017673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burke J. The future of surgery: technology enhanced surgical training report. Bulletin. 2021;103(S1):014–7. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsbull.TB2021.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Triberti S, Petrella F, Gorini A, et al. Augmenting surgery: medical students’ assessment and ergonomics of 3D holograms vs. CT scans for pre-operative planning. EAI Endorsed Trans Pervasive Health Technol. 2021;7(25):167844. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.8-1-2021.167844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pasquali M, Fusini L, Italiano G, et al. Feasibility study of a mixed reality tool for real 3D visualization and planning of left atrial appendage occlusion. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022;16(5):460–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2022.02.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clifton W. Development of a novel 3D printed phantom for teaching neurosurgical trainees the freehand technique of C2 laminar screw placement. World Neurosug. 2019;129:e812-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwon SY, Kim JW, Cho MJ, Al-Sinan AH, Han YJ, Kim YH. The efficacy of cervical spine phantoms for improving resident proficiency in performing ultrasound-guided cervical medial branch block. Medicine. 2018;97(51):e13765.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chawla S. Evaluation of simulation models in neurosurgical training according to face, content, and construct validity: a systematic review. Acta Neurochir. 2022;164:947–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05003-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugiu K, Martin JB, Jean B, Gailloud P, Mandai S, Rufenacht DA. Artificial cerebral aneurysm model for medical testing, training, and research. Neurol Med Chir(Tokyo). 2003;43(2):69–73. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.43.69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guarino S, Marchese E, Ponticelli GS, Scerrati A, Tagliaferri V, Trovalusci F. Additive manufacturing for neurosurgery: digital light processing of individualized patient-specific cerebral aneurysms. Materials. 2021;14(20): 6057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14206057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang L, Ye X, Hao Q, et al. Three-dimensional intracranial middle cerebral artery aneurysm models for aneurysm surgery and training. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;50:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scerrati A, Trovalusci F, Albanese A, et al. A workflow to generate physical 3D models of cerebral aneurysms applying open source freeware for CAD modeling and 3D printing. Interdiscipl Neurosurg. 2019;17:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inat.2019.02.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bairamian D, Liu S, Eftekhar B. Virtual reality angiogram vs 3-Dimensional printed angiogram as an Educational tool—A comparative study. Neurosurgery. 2009;85:E343-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ho WH, Tshimanga IJ, Ngoepe MN, Jermy MC, Geoghegan PH. Evaluation of a desktop 3D printed rigid refractive-indexed-matched flow phantom for PIV measurements on cerebral aneurysms. Cardiovasc Eng Tech. 2020;11(1):14–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-019-00444-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Suzuki Y, Fujitsuka M, Chaloupka JC. Simulation of endovascular neurointervention using silicone models: imaging and manipulation. Neurol Med Chir(Tokyo). 2005;45(11):567–73. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.45.567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fahy P, Mccarthy P, Sultan S, Hynes N, Delassus P, Morris L. An experimental investigation of the hemodynamic variations due to aplastic vessels within three-dimensional phantom models of the circle of Willis. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42(1):123–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0905-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Frölich AMJ, Spallek J, Brehmer L, et al. 3D Printing of Intracranial aneurysms using fused deposition modeling offers highly accurate replications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(1):120–4. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4486.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chivukula VK, Levitt MR, Clark A, et al. Reconstructing patient-specific cerebral aneurysm vasculature for in vitro investigations and treatment efficacy assessments. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;61:153–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang JL, Yuan ZG, Qian GL, Jin GL. 3D printing of intracranial aneurysm based on intracranial digital subtraction angiography and its clinical application. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(24):e11103. http://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sommer KN. Use of patient specific 3D printed neurovascular phantoms to simulate mechanical thrombectomy. 3D Print Med. 2021;7(32):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-021-00122-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmed R, Muirhead W, Williams SC, et al. A synthetic model simulator for intracranial aneurysm clipping: validation of the UpSurgeOn AneurysmBox. Front Surg. 2023;10: 1185516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1185516.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ryan JR, Almefty KK, Nakaji P, Frakes DH. Cerebral aneurysm clipping surgery simulation using patient-specific 3D printing and silicone casting. World Neurosurg. 2016;88:175–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weinstock P, Rehder R, Prabhu SP, Forbes PW, Roussin CJ, Cohen AR. Creation of a novel simulator for minimally invasive neurosurgery: fusion of 3D printing and special effects. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;20:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.1.PEDS16568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mashiko T, Kaneko N, Konno T, Otani K, Nagayama R, Watanabe E. Training in cerebral aneurysm clipping using self-made 3-imensional models. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(4):681–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu Y, Gao Q, Du S, et al. Fabrication of cerebral aneurysm simulator with a desktop 3D printer. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):44301. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Joseph FJ, Weber S, Raabe A, et al. Neurosurgical simulator for training aneurysm microsurgery—a user suitability study involving neurosurgeons and residents. Acta Neurochir. 2020;162:2313–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04522-3.

  30. Belykh E, Giovani A, Abramov I, et al. Novel system of simulation models for aneurysm clipping training: description of models and assessment of face, content, and construct validity. Oper Neurosurg. 2021;21(6):558–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opab357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mery F, Aranda F, Méndez-Orellana C, et al. Reusable low-cost 3D training model for aneurysm clipping. World Neurosurg. 2021;147:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu J, Wen G, Tang C, Zhong C, Yang J, Ma C. A practical 3D-Printed model for training of endoscopic and Exoscopic Intracerebral Hematoma Surgery with a tubular retractor. J Neurol Surg Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2020;81(5):404–11. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fenz W, Dirnberger J. Real-time surgery simulation of intracranial aneurysm clipping with patient-specific geometries and haptic feedback. In: Webster RJ, Yaniv ZR, eds.; 2015:94150H. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2082053

  34. Gmeiner M, Dirnberger J, Fenz W, et al. Virtual cerebral aneurysm clipping with real-time haptic force feedback in neurosurgical education. World Neurosurg. 2018;112:e313-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sergio Teodoro Vite, César Domínguez Velasco, Aldo Francisco Hernández Valencia, Juan Salvador Pérez Lomelí & Miguel Ángel Padilla Castañeda. Virtual Simulation of Brain Sylvian Fissure Exploration and Aneurysm Clipping with Haptic Feedback for Neurosurgical Training. In: De Paolis L, Bourdot P, eds. 10851;2018:230–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95282-6_17

  36. Cabrilo I, Bijlenga P, Schaller K. Augmented reality in the surgery of cerebral aneurysms: a technical report. Operative Neurosurge. 2014;10(2):252–61. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Roethe AL. Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery. Acta Neurochir. 2022;164(1):3–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nicolosi F, Rossini Z, Zaed I, Kolias AG, Fornari M, Servadei F. Neurosurgical digital teaching in low-middle income countries: beyond the frontiers of traditional education. NeuroSurg Focus. 2018;45(4):E17. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.7.FOCUS18288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Palumbo MC. Mixed Reality and Deep Learning for External Ventricular Drainage Placement: A Fast and Automatic Workflow for Emergency Treatments. In: Wang L, Dou Q, Fletcher PT, Speidel S, Li S, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2022 13437:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16449-1_15

  40. Dodier P. An evaluation of physical and augmented patient-specific intracranial aneurysm simulators on microsurgical clipping performance and skills: a randomized controlled study. Neurosurg Focus. 2024;56(1):E9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.10.FOCUS23640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1323–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Coretti M. High quality skull. Published online March 2, 2018. https://www.blendernation.com/2018/03/02/high-quality-skull-free-asset-download/. Accessed 1 Sept 2021.

  43. Cebral JR, Duan X, Chung BJ, Putman C, Aziz K, Robertson AM. Wall mechanical properties and hemodynamics of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(9):1695–703. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Acosta JM, Cayron AF, Dupuy N, et al. Effect of aneurysm and patient characteristics on intracranial aneurysm Wall Thickness. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8: 775307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.775307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. SpectroPlast. TrueSil 20A Technical Data Sheet. Published online January 12, 2024. https://spectroplast.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/TDS_TrueSil_A20.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2024.

  46. Faure F, Duriez C, Delingette H, et al. Soft tissue Biomechanical modeling for computer assisted surgery. In: Payan Y, editor. SOFA: a Multi-model Framework for Interactive Physical Simulation. Studies in Mechanobiology, Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials. Volume 11. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. pp. 283–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/8415_2012_125.

  47. Dequidt J, Coevoet E, Thinès L, Duriez C. Vascular neurosurgery simulation with bimanual haptic feedback. In: Workshop on virtual reality interaction and physical simulation. Eurographics Association; 2015:10. https://doi.org/10.2312/vriphys.20151337.

  48. Wang AS, Campos JK, Colby GP, Coon AL, Lin M. Cerebral aneurysm treatment trends in National Inpatient Sample 2007–2016: endovascular therapies favored over surgery. J NeuroInterv Surg. 2020;12(10):957–63. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg. 1997;84(2):273–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02502.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stifano V, Palumbo MC, Chidambaram S, et al. The use of mixed reality for the treatment planning of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg Sci. 2021;67(4):491–7. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05356-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Wei-Te Wang, MD, for the photo documentation, Margherita Sironi, MSc for the material research efforts in the initial stages of development, as well as Lydia Zopf, PhD from the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology for performing the MicroCT scans of the clips.

Funding

Parts of this work have been funded by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) within the project “Additive Manufacturing for M3dical RESearch, M3dRES”, nr. 858060 and by Austria Wirtschaftsservice Gesellschaft mbH (aws) within the project “New patient-specific surgical simulator”, nr. P2410019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

(I) Concept and design: C.L., D.P., M.F., P.MC., R.CL.A.; (II) Collection and assembly of data: C.L., D.P.; (III) Data analysis and interpretation: C.L., D.P., M.F., R.CL.A.; (IV) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Moscato.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research study was approved by the institutional ethical commission of Medical University of Vienna (Nr. 1593/2021).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors applied for patent protection of part of the methods described in this manuscript, and its potential commercialization is being considered by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Video 1: ICG-VA simulation on physical simulator with Raymond 1.

Video 2: ICG-VA simulation on physical simulator with Raymond 3.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Civilla, L., Dodier, P., Palumbo, M.C. et al. Development and assessment of case-specific physical and augmented reality simulators for intracranial aneurysm clipping. 3D Print Med 10, 30 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-024-00235-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-024-00235-w

Keywords